Temporal Duality: Harmonizing the Block Universe with Triadic Consciousness and Liturgical Order
Abstract
This paper proposes a unified theological and physical framework to resolve the tension between Divine Omniscience and human temporal experience. By adopting a "Dual-View" ontology, we argue that the Creator interacts with a "Block Universe" (where all events are simultaneous coordinates), while created biological entities inhabit a "Progressive Universe" (constrained by the speed of light and causality). This model utilizes the e-Consciousness Triadic framework to position the human Spirit as the sole interface capable of accessing "Block" reality—manifested in prophecy and the "already seated" status of the believer. Furthermore, we posit that the 364-day Zadokite Calendar and the Eucharist serve as liturgical mechanisms that synchronize the believer with this eternal reality, acting as "trans-temporal" anchors for the Glorified Body.
1. Introduction: The Ontological vs. Epistemological Divide
The central paradox of classical theism and modern cosmology is the nature of time. If God is omniscient, the future must be fixed (The Block Universe). However, if humans are free agents, the future must be open (The Progressive Universe).
This paper argues that this is not a contradiction of reality, but a distinction of observation. We propose that the universe operates as a Block sub specie aeternitatis (from God's view) but as Progressive sub specie temporis (from the human view).
Biblical theology supports this duality. Revelation 13:8 describes Christ as "the Lamb slain from the foundation of the world," implying the crucifixion is an eternal coordinate in the Block. Simultaneously, believers are urged to "work out your own salvation" (Philippians 2:12), implying a linear, progressive journey.
2. The Physics of Limitation: Why the Progressive View is Valid for Biology
Critics of the Block Universe often argue it leads to fatalism. However, Special Relativity provides the necessary constraint to preserve human agency: the speed of light (c).
While the geometry of spacetime may be a static 4-dimensional manifold (Minkowski space), internal observers are strictly limited by their "Light Cones."
Consider an observer in the Andromeda Galaxy, 2.5 million light-years away. According to the relativity of simultaneity (the Rietdijk–Putnam argument), if this observer moves towards Earth, their "plane of simultaneity" might intersect with Earth's future. Technically, their "now" contains our "tomorrow."
However, this does not grant them foreknowledge. Due to the vast distance and the speed limit of light, they cannot "peep" into our future. No signal can reach them, and no signal can return to us before the event happens.
Therefore, for all biological intents, the universe is Progressive. We operate with a "fog of war" regarding the future. This limitation is essential for free will; we make choices because we genuinely do not know the outcome.
Only an observer outside the manifold—God—possesses the "Super-Luminal" view required to see the entire Block without violating causality. Crucially, God is not viewing a distinct or alien universe; He perceives the exact same spacetime continuum we inhabit, but His relationship to the dimension of Time is absolute rather than relative. While human consciousness is restricted to a single "now" slice—moving incrementally from past to future—God encompasses the total volume of space and the total duration of time in a single, simultaneous act of perception.
To the Creator, the "space and time of eternity" is simply the entire Block held "in one shot." He sees the Alpha (Big Bang) and the Omega (Final Judgment) not as distant events, but as co-present realities within the same manifold. Our limit is not that the future does not exist, but that our specific spacetime coordinate denies us access to it.
2.1 The Agency of Actualisation. Resolving the "A, B,C" Paradox
A common objection to the Block Universe is the apparent negation of free will: If the future is fixed, how can a choice between alternatives A, B, and C be genuine? If the subject chooses 'B', were 'A' and 'C' ever truly possible?
We propose that the Block does not render the alternatives illusionary; rather, it represents the crystallization of the choice.
Consider the decision process as a quantum event. In the Progressive experience (the "Now"), the Soul encounters options A, B, and C as a superposition of probabilistic states. To the human mind, the future is genuinely open; the "wave function" of the decision has not yet collapsed. The struggle to choose is real, and the cognitive weighing of options is the mechanism by which reality is formed.
When the subject freely exercises their will to select 'B', they are not discovering a pre-written script they were forced to follow. Instead, their free act of choosing 'B' is precisely what generates the "B-coordinate" in the Block.
From the Human View (Progressive): I am standing at a fork in the road. I can go Left (A) or Right (B). I deliberate and choose Right.
From the Divine View (Block): God sees the roadmap where you did choose Right.
Crucially, God’s foreknowledge of 'B' is derivative, not causative. The Block contains 'B' because you chose it; you did not choose 'B' because it was in the Block. The Block is the archive of your freedom, not the prison of your fate. Therefore, the "fixed" nature of the future is the result of your free agency, not the enemy of it.
3. The Triadic Interface: The Spirit as the "Block" Receiver
If the Body and Soul are locked in the Progressive timeline (Linear Time), how does Prophecy occur? How can a prophet describe the future with the certainty of memory?
We propose that the Spirit (Pneuma) acts as a non-local interface. Unlike the Body, which is comprised of fermions and bosons subject to entropy, the Spirit is "breathed" from God and retains quantum entanglement with the Creator's perspective.
In this model, Prophecy is not a calculation of probabilities; it is a momentary "lifting" of the Spirit into the Block perspective. The prophet views the coordinate t+n (the future) as an accomplished fact and relays this data to the linear Soul. This confirms the reality of the Block without violating the linear experience of the Body.
This also elucidates Ephesians 2:6, which states we are "raised us up together, and made us sit together in heavenly places in Christ Jesus."
Physically: Our bodies are in traffic, in pain, or in decay (Progressive).
Ontologically: Our Spirits are already seated in the Block. The "You" that is glorified is co-existent with the "You" that is suffering. Salvation is the process of the Progressive Soul aligning with the Static Spirit.
4. Liturgical Synchronization: The Zadokite Calendar and the Eucharist
If we are citizens of the Block living in a Progressive world, our liturgy should reflect the order of the Block.
A. The Zadokite Calendar (364 Days)
The solar calendar found in the Dead Sea Scrolls (Jubilees, 1 Enoch) offers a perfect symmetry that contrasts with the "wobble" of lunar calendars.
The Lunar year is ~354 days (irregular).
The Gregorian year is 365.25 days (requires leap years).
The Zadokite year is exactly 364 days.
In this system, festivals always fall on the same day of the week. It represents a "mathematical rest"—a time system that does not decay or shift. It is the calendar of the Block. By observing this rhythm, the community steps out of "nature's time" (entropy/chaos) and into "God's time" (symmetry/order). It is an act of spiritual synchronization.
B. The Eucharist: Food for the Glorified Body
The Eucharist is often viewed as a memorial.
If the Glorified Body is our "Block" state—imperishable and eternal—it requires a sustenance that transcends linear decay. The Eucharist is that substance. It is the "medicine of immortality" (Ignatius of Antioch) because it belongs to the future logic of the Resurrection.
When we partake, we are feeding the "Already Seated" reality within us. We are consuming the future to sustain the present. This aligns with the e-Consciousness view that the Spirit requires different data and energy than the Body. The Body eats bread (Progressive energy); the Spirit eats the Eucharist (Block energy).
5. Conclusion
The dual-view ontology offers a robust defense of Christian Eschatology in the face of modern physics. It validates the human experience of linear time (Progressive) while upholding the sovereignty of God over all time (Block).
We conclude that:
The Future is Real: It exists in the Block, allowing for Omniscience and Prophecy.
The Present is Open: It is experienced progressively by biology, allowing for Free Will.
The Believer is a Hybrid: We are physically linear but spiritually eternal.
Through the e-Consciousness model, we understand that to "walk in the Spirit" is to tune one's consciousness to the frequency of the Block—anchored by the perfect order of the Zadokite Calendar and nourished by the eschatological food of the Eucharist.
References
Madurasinghe, L. (2026). The Anthropic Principle and the Physics of Resurrection: A Triadic E-Consciousness Model. OIUCM.
Ellis, G. F. R. (2006). Physics in the Real Universe: Time and Spacetime Structure. General Relativity and Gravitation.
Polkinghorne, J. (2002). The God of Hope and the End of the World. Yale University Press.
Talmon, S. (1958). The Calendar Reckoning of the Sect from the Judean Desert. Scripta Hierosolymitana.
VanderKam, J. C. (1998). Calendars in the Dead Sea Scrolls: Measuring Time. Routledge.
Einstein, A. (1952). Relativity: The Special and the General Theory. Crown Publishers. (Reference to the "illusion" of time separation).
Putnam, H. (1967). Time and Physical Geometry. Journal of Philosophy. (The Rietdijk–Putnam argument).
Torrance, T. F. (1976). Space, Time and Resurrection. Eerdmans.


