The Medicine of Immortality: A Block Universe Perspective on Eucharistic Projection and the Glorified Body
Abstract
This paper proposes a synthesis of Orthodox Eucharistic theology and the "Block Universe" model of spacetime to resolve the historic tension between the "Real Sacrifice" of the Mass and the "Once-for-all" nature of Calvary. By interpreting the Liturgical Anamnesis not as a repetition of history but as a consciousness-based projection into the eternal coordinate of the Cross, we argue that the believer accesses the historical reality of the Crucifixion while partaking of the eschatological reality of the Glorified Body. This model finds its strongest evidentiary support in the Last Supper, where Christ demonstrated a non-linear, superposed state of being—simultaneously the Offerer and the Offering—validating the claim that the Eucharist is the "Medicine of Immortality" for the transformation of human consciousness.
Introduction: The Antinomy of the Real Sacrifice
In Orthodox dogmatic theology, the Eucharist is defined by a profound antinomy: it is a "Real Sacrifice," yet it is "not a new sacrifice," nor is it a mere "repetition" of the Sacrifice of the Cross (Bulgakov, 1933). The classic Western scholastic debates—often trapped in the binary of "transubstantiation" (molecular change) versus "symbolism" (psychological recall)—fail to capture the Eastern insistence on Metousiosis (a change of essence/reality).
The modern believer is thus left with a paradox: How can we stand at the foot of a Cross that existed 2,000 years ago? And if Christ is risen, why do we consume symbols of His death (Body and Blood)? This paper argues that the solution lies in a convergence of Patristic theology and the physics of the "Block Universe," suggesting that the Liturgy serves as a mechanism for projection—a movement of consciousness from Chronos (linear time) to Kairos (God’s eternal now).
The Liturgical Wormhole: Anamnesis in a Block Universe
The Greek term Anamnesis, central to the Eucharistic prayer ("Do this in remembrance of me"), is frequently mistranslated as "remembrance." In the ancient Semitic and Hellenistic context, it denotes not a mental recollection of an absent past, but an ontological "re-calling" or "making present" of a past event (Dix, 1945).
From the perspective of the Block Universe theory—where past, present, and future exist simultaneously as a four-dimensional manifold—the event of Golgotha is not "gone"; it is a permanent, fixed coordinate in spacetime. The Divine Liturgy does not pull the Cross forward to the present; rather, it lifts the assembly out of the stream of linear time. As the priest intones, "Thine of Thine own," the consciousness of the Church is projected to the intersection of time and eternity.
This aligns with the "e-Consciousness" framework, where high-level consciousness (the 4th 'C') transcends the local limitations of the biological brain. The believer does not merely "think about" Jesus; they enter the spacetime coordinate where the Lamb is eternally slain (Rev 13:8).
The Proleptic Paradox: The Evidence of the Last Supper
The strongest validation for this non-linear, Block Universe interpretation is found in the institution of the Eucharist itself. At the Last Supper, Jesus took bread and said, "This is my Body which is broken for you."
Critically, in linear time, His body was not yet broken. He stood before the disciples, alive, intact, and breathing. If the Eucharist were merely a biological transmission of earthly tissue, this action would be impossible. However, within a Block Universe framework, Jesus—acting as the High Priest of the Order of Melchizedek—accessed the reality of Good Friday from the vantage point of Thursday evening.
He stood in a state of "superposition," simultaneously the Living Host and the Sacrificial Victim. He demonstrated that the Eucharist is not bound by the arrow of time. If Christ could distribute the fruits of the Sacrifice before it historically occurred, the Church can certainly access them after they have occurred. The mechanism is the same: the non-locality of the Divine Act.
The Apocalyptic Confirmation: A View from the Block
The validity of the Block Universe model in Christian theology is most vividly confirmed by the Apocalypse of St. John. The Apostle did not merely predict a linear future; he was elevated to a vantage point outside of spacetime constraints, allowing him to witness the 'Eschaton' as a present reality. His consistent use of the aorist (past) tense to describe future events ('I saw a new heaven and a new earth') indicates that these events occupy a fixed coordinate in the Divine economy.
This inextricably links the Eucharist to the promise of 2 Timothy 1:10, where Christ is said to have 'abolished death.' If death is the ultimate constraint of linear time (entropy), then the 'abolition' of death is the transcendence of that timeline. The Eucharist, therefore, fulfills the specific promise of John 6:58 ('he who eats this bread will live forever') not by magic, but by ontology: it is the ingestion of the only matter in the universe—the Glorified Body—that has already survived the heat-death of history.
The Interface and the Reality: From Calvarian Biology to Glorified Ontology
A critical distinction must be made between the interface of the sacrament and the reality received.
The Historical Interface (The "Body and Blood"): We use the language of "flesh and blood" because that is the only earthly reality to which our biological senses can connect. The breaking of the bread serves as the tactile anchor—the "user interface"—that allows our minds to grasp the severity of the Sacrifice. It connects us to the kenosis (self-emptying) of the Cross.
The Eschatological Reality (The Glorified Body): While we project to the event of the death, we do not partake of a corpse. The Orthodox Church is adamant that we receive the Risen Christ. The elements, having been offered at the Cross, are returned to us as the Glorified Body.
This resolves the theological difficulty of "bleeding host" miracles. While such phenomena may occur as signs for the weak in faith, they are not the theological ideal. The Glorified Body is no longer subject to biological decay, blood type, or cellular division. It is the Soma Pneumatikon (Spiritual Body) described by St. Paul (1 Cor 15:44)—matter infused entirely with Divine Energy.
Proleptic Glory: The Intrusion of the Eschaton into History
The validity of the "Block Universe" model is further corroborated by the pre-resurrection ministry of Christ. If the Glorified Body were merely a chronological successor to the earthly body, Jesus would have been bound entirely by Newtonian physics until Easter morning. However, the Gospels present a "Proleptic Christology"—instances where the future reality of the Glorified Body intrudes into the present.
Suspension of Natural Law: The act of walking on water (Mark 6:48) and the Transfiguration on Mount Tabor (Matthew 17:2) were not violations of nature, but revelations of a higher nature. They demonstrate that the properties of the Glorified Body (luminosity, non-locality, and freedom from gravity) were latent within Him, accessible at will. He did not "acquire" glory at the Resurrection; He simply ceased to mask it.
The "I AM" Singularity: When Christ declared, "Before Abraham was, I AM" (John 8:58), He linguistically situated Himself outside the arrow of time. He claimed a simultaneous existence in the era of the Patriarchs and the present moment.
Implications for Eucharist: This confirms that the separation between "Historical Body" and "Glorified Body" is a limitation of human perception, not Divine reality. If Jesus could manifest Glorified properties before the Cross, the Church can certainly access the merit of the Cross after the Resurrection. The Eucharist is the stable, liturgical point where this "Intrusion of Glory" becomes accessible to the believer.
Conclusion: The Medicine of Immortality
When we partake of the Eucharist, we are projected to the trauma of Calvary to witness the price of our redemption, but we are fed from the table of the Resurrection. We consume the Glorified Body, which acts as the "Medicine of Immortality" (Ignatius of Antioch, Epistle to the Ephesians).
Just as the earthly body of Jesus was the vehicle for the Incarnation, the Glorified Body in the Eucharist is the vehicle for our Theosis. It reprograms the human "biological hardware" with the "software" of eternity. We do not simply remember a death; we ingest the life-force of the Risen Lord, collapsing the distance between the history of the Cross and the eternity of the Kingdom into a single, transformative moment of Communion.
Selected References
Bulgakov, S. (1933). The Eucharistic Dogma. In The Orthodox Church. Centenary Press. (Discusses the antinomy of the "real but not new" sacrifice).
Dix, G. (1945). The Shape of the Liturgy.
Dacre Press. (Foundational text on the meaning of Anamnesis as "re-calling" rather than psychological memory). Florovsky, G. (1972). Bible, Church, Tradition: An Eastern Orthodox View. Nordland Publishing. (Explores the concept of the "Eternal Now" in liturgy).
Ignatius of Antioch. (c. 108 AD). Epistle to the Ephesians. (Source of the phrase "Medicine of Immortality").
Polkinghorne, J. (2002). Quantum Physics and Theology: An Unexpected Kinship. Yale University Press.
(Provides the scientific framework for understanding non-locality and the Block Universe in a theological context). Schmemann, A. (1973). For the Life of the World. St. Vladimir's Seminary Press. (Theological exposition on the Eucharist as the entrance into the Kingdom/Eschaton).
Torrance, T.F. (1975). Space, Time and Resurrection. Eerdmans. (Discusses the Resurrection body and its relation to spacetime).


